Sunday, January 29, 2012

Group E-Week #2-Mayra

This is my response to the Weekly Dialogue for Week #2. I chose option B because I am in the Elementary Level Group.

3 comments:

  1. You had a really well thought out response. I too had conflict with passing tests and getting good grades. I do agree that these are not the best indicators of how well a student in comprehending material, but I don't know how we can replace this kind of evaluation system for a better one! (that's a whole other topic) But... I don't agree with you on the spelling. Spelling might not be of up most importance, but it definitely needs to be part of a reading program. It is a basic skill that needs to be learned before we can move on to more complex skills.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mayra...some very interesting perspectives. I appreciate your insights on the role that frustration may play in discouraging students from reading and the way that tests and grades can play into this. I also think that it is true that we move so many students too fast so as to prepare them for standardized tests. It seems pretty counter-intuitive, doesn't it?
    Last, I'm with Karina on the spelling. You were cut off at two minutes, so I suspect you had more to say about its role in learning to read. One thing to think about spelling is that it does play a big role in writing--not necessarily in reading.
    Nice work.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree that passing test is not an accurate way to measure a students knowledge and that this does directly link with reading process. I also agree that students don't need to take a test in order to read. I also agree about getting good grades shouldn't have been on the list because it can push them to not read. Getting good grades shouldn't determine if you should read or not and doesn't directly link with the reading process. Think you answer this really well!
    -Stacia

    ReplyDelete